@article {2481, title = {Violation of the ultrastructural size principle in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex underlies working memory impairment in the aged common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).}, journal = {Front Aging Neurosci}, volume = {15}, year = {2023}, month = {2023}, pages = {1146245}, abstract = {

Morphology and function of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and corresponding working memory performance, are affected early in the aging process, but nearly half of aged individuals are spared of working memory deficits. Translationally relevant model systems are critical for determining the neurobiological drivers of this variability. The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is advantageous as a model for these investigations because, as a non-human primate, marmosets have a clearly defined dlPFC that enables measurement of prefrontal-dependent cognitive functions, and their short (\~{}10 year) lifespan facilitates longitudinal studies of aging. Previously, we characterized working memory capacity in a cohort of marmosets that collectively covered the lifespan, and found age-related working memory impairment. We also found a remarkable degree of heterogeneity in performance, similar to that found in humans. Here, we tested the hypothesis that changes to synaptic ultrastructure that affect synaptic efficacy stratify marmosets that age with cognitive impairment from those that age without cognitive impairment. We utilized electron microscopy to visualize synapses in the marmoset dlPFC and measured the sizes of boutons, presynaptic mitochondria, and synapses. We found that coordinated scaling of the sizes of synapses and mitochondria with their associated boutons is essential for intact working memory performance in aged marmosets. Further, lack of synaptic scaling, due to a remarkable failure of synaptic mitochondria to scale with presynaptic boutons, selectively underlies age-related working memory impairment. We posit that this decoupling results in mismatched energy supply and demand, leading to impaired synaptic transmission. We also found that aged marmosets have fewer synapses in dlPFC than young, though the severity of synapse loss did not predict whether aging occurred with or without cognitive impairment. This work identifies a novel mechanism of synapse dysfunction that stratifies marmosets that age with cognitive impairment from those that age without cognitive impairment. The process by which synaptic scaling is regulated is yet unknown and warrants future investigation.

}, issn = {1663-4365}, doi = {10.3389/fnagi.2023.1146245}, author = {Glavis-Bloom, Courtney and Vanderlip, Casey R and Weiser Novak, Sammy and Kuwajima, Masaaki and Kirk, Lyndsey and Harris, Kristen M and Manor, Uri and Reynolds, John H} } @article {2179, title = {Valence opponency in peripheral olfactory processing.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {119}, year = {2022}, month = {2022 Feb 01}, abstract = {

A hallmark of complex sensory systems is the organization of neurons into functionally meaningful maps, which allow for comparison and contrast of parallel inputs via lateral inhibition. However, it is unclear whether such a map exists in olfaction. Here, we address this question by determining the organizing principle underlying the stereotyped pairing of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in sensory hairs, wherein compartmentalized neurons inhibit each other via ephaptic coupling. Systematic behavioral assays reveal that most paired ORNs antagonistically regulate the same type of behavior. Such valence opponency is relevant in critical behavioral contexts including place preference, egg laying, and courtship. Odor-mixture experiments show that ephaptic inhibition provides a peripheral means for evaluating and shaping countervailing cues relayed to higher brain centers. Furthermore, computational modeling suggests that this organization likely contributes to processing ratio information in odor mixtures. This olfactory valence map may have evolved to swiftly process ethologically meaningful odor blends without involving costly synaptic computation.

}, issn = {1091-6490}, doi = {10.1073/pnas.2120134119}, author = {Wu, Shiuan-Tze and Chen, Jen-Yung and Martin, Vanessa and Ng, Renny and Zhang, Ye and Grover, Dhruv and Greenspan, Ralph J and Aljadeff, Johnatan and Su, Chih-Ying} } @article {164, title = {Vertebrate versus invertebrate neural circuits.}, journal = {Curr Biol}, volume = {23}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jun 17}, pages = {R504-6}, keywords = {Animals, Invertebrates, Nervous System, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Vertebrates}, issn = {1879-0445}, author = {Katz, Paul and Grillner, Sten and Wilson, Rachel and Borst, Alexander and Greenspan, Ralph and Buzs{\'a}ki, Gy{\"o}rgy and Martin, Kevan and Marder, Eve and Kristan, William and Friedrich, Rainer and Chklovskii, Dmitri Mitya} } @article {202, title = {Visual processing of contour patterns under conditions of inattentional blindness.}, journal = {J Cogn Neurosci}, volume = {24}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Feb}, pages = {287-303}, abstract = {

An inattentional blindness paradigm was adapted to measure ERPs elicited by visual contour patterns that were or were not consciously perceived. In the first phase of the experiment, subjects performed an attentionally demanding task while task-irrelevant line segments formed square-shaped patterns or random configurations. After the square patterns had been presented 240 times, subjects{\textquoteright} awareness of these patterns was assessed. More than half of all subjects, when queried, failed to notice the square patterns and were thus considered inattentionally blind during this first phase. In the second phase of the experiment, the task and stimuli were the same, but following this phase, all of the subjects reported having seen the patterns. ERPs recorded over the occipital pole differed in amplitude from 220 to 260 msec for the pattern stimuli compared with the random arrays regardless of whether subjects were aware of the patterns. At subsequent latencies (300-340 msec) however, ERPs over bilateral occipital-parietal areas differed between patterns and random arrays only when subjects were aware of the patterns. Finally, in a third phase of the experiment, subjects viewed the same stimuli, but the task was altered so that the patterns became task relevant. Here, the same two difference components were evident but were followed by a series of additional components that were absent in the first two phases of the experiment. We hypothesize that the ERP difference at 220-260 msec reflects neural activity associated with automatic contour integration whereas the difference at 300-340 msec reflects visual awareness, both of which are dissociable from task-related postperceptual processing.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attention, Awareness, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Perceptual Masking, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Perception}, issn = {1530-8898}, doi = {10.1162/jocn_a_00111}, author = {Pitts, Michael A and Mart{\'\i}nez, Ant{\'\i}gona and Hillyard, Steven A} }