@article {1687, title = {How struggling adult readers use contextual information when comprehending speech: Evidence from event-related potentials.}, journal = {Int J Psychophysiol}, volume = {125}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 03}, pages = {1-9}, abstract = {

We investigated how struggling adult readers make use of sentence context to facilitate word processing when comprehending spoken language, conditions under which print decoding is not a barrier to comprehension. Stimuli were strongly and weakly constraining sentences (as measured by cloze probability), which ended with the most expected word based on those constraints or an unexpected but plausible word. Community-dwelling adults with varying literacy skills listened to continuous speech while their EEG was recorded. Participants, regardless of literacy level, showed N400 effects yoked to the cloze probability of the targets, with larger N400 amplitudes for less expected than more expected words. However, literacy-related differences emerged in an earlier time window of 170-300 ms: higher literacy adults produced a reduced negativity for strongly predictable targets over anterior channels, similar to previously reported effects on the Phonological Mapping Negativity (PMN), whereas low-literacy adults did not. Collectively, these findings suggest that in auditory sentence processing literacy may not notably affect the incremental activation of semantic features, but that comprehenders with underdeveloped literacy skills may be less likely to engage predictive processing. Thus, basic mechanisms of comprehension may be recruited differently as a function of literacy development-even in spoken language.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Comprehension, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Literacy, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reading, Speech, Young Adult}, issn = {1872-7697}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.013}, author = {Ng, Shukhan and Payne, Brennan R and Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L and Federmeier, Kara D} } @article {190, title = {Signed words in the congenitally deaf evoke typical late lexicosemantic responses with no early visual responses in left superior temporal cortex.}, journal = {J Neurosci}, volume = {32}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Jul 11}, pages = {9700-5}, abstract = {

Congenitally deaf individuals receive little or no auditory input, and when raised by deaf parents, they acquire sign as their native and primary language. We asked two questions regarding how the deaf brain in humans adapts to sensory deprivation: (1) is meaning extracted and integrated from signs using the same classical left hemisphere frontotemporal network used for speech in hearing individuals, and (2) in deafness, is superior temporal cortex encompassing primary and secondary auditory regions reorganized to receive and process visual sensory information at short latencies? Using MEG constrained by individual cortical anatomy obtained with MRI, we examined an early time window associated with sensory processing and a late time window associated with lexicosemantic integration. We found that sign in deaf individuals and speech in hearing individuals activate a highly similar left frontotemporal network (including superior temporal regions surrounding auditory cortex) during lexicosemantic processing, but only speech in hearing individuals activates auditory regions during sensory processing. Thus, neural systems dedicated to processing high-level linguistic information are used for processing language regardless of modality or hearing status, and we do not find evidence for rewiring of afferent connections from visual systems to auditory cortex.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Deafness, Evoked Potentials, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetoencephalography, Male, Photic Stimulation, Semantics, Sign Language, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors, Young Adult}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1002-12.2012}, author = {Leonard, Matthew K and Ferjan Ramirez, Naja and Torres, Christina and Travis, Katherine E and Hatrak, Marla and Mayberry, Rachel I and Halgren, Eric} } @article {194, title = {Atypical face versus object processing and hemispheric asymmetries in 10-month-old infants at risk for autism.}, journal = {Biol Psychiatry}, volume = {66}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Nov 15}, pages = {950-7}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented atypicalities in face/object processing in children and adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). To investigate whether such atypicalities may reflect a genetically mediated risk factor present early in development, we measured face/object processing in 10-month-old high-risk infants who carry some of the genes associated with ASD because they have an older sibling diagnosed with the disorder.

METHODS: We employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure cortical responses to pictures of faces and objects, the objects being toys. Latencies and amplitudes of four ERP components (P100, N290, P400, and Nc) were compared between 20 high-risk infants and 20 low-risk control subjects (infants with no family history of ASD).

RESULTS: Responses to faces versus objects differed between high- and low-risk infants for the latencies of the N290 and P400. Differences were driven by faster responses to faces than objects in low-risk, but not high-risk, infants (P400) and, conversely, faster responses to objects than faces in high-risk, but not low-risk, infants (N290). Object responses were also faster in high-risk than low-risk infants (both N290 and P400). Left versus right hemisphere responses also differed between high- and low-risk infants for the amplitudes of the P100, N290, and P400; collapsed across faces/objects, low-risk, but not high-risk, infants exhibited hemisphere asymmetries.

CONCLUSIONS: Genetic risk for ASD is associated with atypical face versus object processing and an atypical lack of hemispheric asymmetry early in life. These atypicalities might contribute to development of the disorder.

}, keywords = {Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Face, Female, Fourier Analysis, Functional Laterality, Humans, Infant, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Risk}, issn = {1873-2402}, doi = {10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.031}, author = {McCleery, Joseph P and Akshoomoff, Natacha and Dobkins, Karen R and Carver, Leslie J} }