@article {1687, title = {How struggling adult readers use contextual information when comprehending speech: Evidence from event-related potentials.}, journal = {Int J Psychophysiol}, volume = {125}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 03}, pages = {1-9}, abstract = {

We investigated how struggling adult readers make use of sentence context to facilitate word processing when comprehending spoken language, conditions under which print decoding is not a barrier to comprehension. Stimuli were strongly and weakly constraining sentences (as measured by cloze probability), which ended with the most expected word based on those constraints or an unexpected but plausible word. Community-dwelling adults with varying literacy skills listened to continuous speech while their EEG was recorded. Participants, regardless of literacy level, showed N400 effects yoked to the cloze probability of the targets, with larger N400 amplitudes for less expected than more expected words. However, literacy-related differences emerged in an earlier time window of 170-300 ms: higher literacy adults produced a reduced negativity for strongly predictable targets over anterior channels, similar to previously reported effects on the Phonological Mapping Negativity (PMN), whereas low-literacy adults did not. Collectively, these findings suggest that in auditory sentence processing literacy may not notably affect the incremental activation of semantic features, but that comprehenders with underdeveloped literacy skills may be less likely to engage predictive processing. Thus, basic mechanisms of comprehension may be recruited differently as a function of literacy development-even in spoken language.

}, keywords = {Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Comprehension, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Literacy, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reading, Speech, Young Adult}, issn = {1872-7697}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.013}, author = {Ng, Shukhan and Payne, Brennan R and Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L and Federmeier, Kara D} } @article {1680, title = {Optogenetic manipulation of neural circuits in awake marmosets.}, journal = {J Neurophysiol}, volume = {116}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 09 01}, pages = {1286-94}, abstract = {

Optogenetics has revolutionized the study of functional neuronal circuitry (Boyden ES, Zhang F, Bamberg E, Nagel G, Deisseroth K. Nat Neurosci 8: 1263-1268, 2005; Deisseroth K. Nat Methods 8: 26-29, 2011). Although these techniques have been most successfully implemented in rodent models, they have the potential to be similarly impactful in studies of nonhuman primate brains. Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) have recently emerged as a candidate primate model for gene editing, providing a potentially powerful model for studies of neural circuitry and disease in primates. The application of viral transduction methods in marmosets for identifying and manipulating neuronal circuitry is a crucial step in developing this species for neuroscience research. In the present study we developed a novel, chronic method to successfully induce rapid photostimulation in individual cortical neurons transduced by adeno-associated virus to express channelrhodopsin (ChR2) in awake marmosets. We found that large proportions of neurons could be effectively photoactivated following viral transduction and that this procedure could be repeated for several months. These data suggest that techniques for viral transduction and optical manipulation of neuronal populations are suitable for marmosets and can be combined with existing behavioral preparations in the species to elucidate the functional neural circuitry underlying perceptual and cognitive processes.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Brain, Callithrix, Dependovirus, Female, Genetic Vectors, Luminescent Proteins, Microelectrodes, Models, Animal, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Optogenetics, Photic Stimulation, Rhodopsin, Serogroup, Wakefulness}, issn = {1522-1598}, doi = {10.1152/jn.00197.2016}, author = {MacDougall, Matthew and Nummela, Samuel U and Coop, Shanna and Disney, Anita and Mitchell, Jude F and Miller, Cory T} } @article {1682, title = {Mean signal and response time influences on multivoxel signals of contextual retrieval in the medial temporal lobe.}, journal = {Brain Behav}, volume = {5}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Feb}, pages = {e00302}, abstract = {

INTRODUCTION: The medial temporal lobe supports integrating the "what," "where," and "when" of an experience into a unified memory. However, it remains unclear how representations of these contextual features are neurally encoded and distributed across medial temporal lobe subregions.

METHODS: This study conducted functional magnetic resonance imaging of the medial temporal lobe, while participants retrieved pair, spatial, and temporal source memories. Multivoxel classifiers were trained to distinguish between retrieval conditions before and after correction for mean signal and response times, to more thoroughly characterize the multivoxel signal associated with memory context.

RESULTS: Activity in perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex dissociated between memory for associated items and memory for their spatiotemporal context, and hippocampal activity was linked to memory for spatial context. However, perirhinal and hippocampal classifiers were, respectively, driven by effects of mean signal amplitude and task difficulty, whereas the parahippocampal classifier survived correction for these effects.

CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate dissociable coding mechanisms for episodic memory context across the medial temporal lobe, and further highlight a critical distinction between multivoxel representations driven by spatially distributed activity patterns, and those driven by the regional signal.

}, keywords = {Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Photic Stimulation, Temporal Lobe, Young Adult}, issn = {2162-3279}, doi = {10.1002/brb3.302}, author = {Reas, Emilie T and Brewer, James B} } @article {1678, title = {Motion dependence of smooth pursuit eye movements in the marmoset.}, journal = {J Neurophysiol}, volume = {113}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jun 01}, pages = {3954-60}, abstract = {

Smooth pursuit eye movements stabilize slow-moving objects on the retina by matching eye velocity with target velocity. Two critical components are required to generate smooth pursuit: first, because it is a voluntary eye movement, the subject must select a target to pursue to engage the tracking system; and second, generating smooth pursuit requires a moving stimulus. We examined whether this behavior also exists in the common marmoset, a New World primate that is increasingly attracting attention as a genetic model for mental disease and systems neuroscience. We measured smooth pursuit in two marmosets, previously trained to perform fixation tasks, using the standard Rashbass step-ramp pursuit paradigm. We first measured the aspects of visual motion that drive pursuit eye movements. Smooth eye movements were in the same direction as target motion, indicating that pursuit was driven by target movement rather than by displacement. Both the open-loop acceleration and closed-loop eye velocity exhibited a linear relationship with target velocity for slow-moving targets, but this relationship declined for higher speeds. We next examined whether marmoset pursuit eye movements depend on an active engagement of the pursuit system by measuring smooth eye movements evoked by small perturbations of motion from fixation or during pursuit. Pursuit eye movements were much larger during pursuit than from fixation, indicating that pursuit is actively gated. Several practical advantages of the marmoset brain, including the accessibility of the middle temporal (MT) area and frontal eye fields at the cortical surface, merit its utilization for studying pursuit movements.

}, keywords = {Acceleration, Animals, Callithrix, Motion, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Pursuit, Smooth, Retina, Visual Fields}, issn = {1522-1598}, doi = {10.1152/jn.00197.2015}, author = {Mitchell, Jude F and Priebe, Nicholas J and Miller, Cory T} } @article {200, title = {Contrast dependence and differential contributions from somatostatin- and parvalbumin-expressing neurons to spatial integration in mouse V1.}, journal = {J Neurosci}, volume = {33}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jul 3}, pages = {11145-54}, abstract = {

A characteristic feature in the primary visual cortex is that visual responses are suppressed as a stimulus extends beyond the classical receptive field. Here, we examined the role of inhibitory neurons expressing somatostatin (SOM$^{+}$) or parvalbumin (PV$^{+}$) on surround suppression and preferred receptive field size. We recorded multichannel extracellular activity in V1 of transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin in SOM$^{+}$ neurons or PV$^{+}$ neurons. Preferred size and surround suppression were measured using drifting square-wave gratings of varying radii and at two contrasts. Consistent with findings in primates, we found that the preferred size was larger for lower contrasts across all cortical depths, whereas the suppression index (SI) showed a trend to decrease with contrast. We then examined the effect of these metrics on units that were suppressed by photoactivation of either SOM$^{+}$ or PV$^{+}$ neurons. When activating SOM$^{+}$ neurons, we found a significant increase in SI at cortical depths \>400 μm, whereas activating PV$^{+}$ neurons caused a trend toward lower SIs regardless of cortical depth. Conversely, activating PV$^{+}$ neurons significantly increased preferred size across all cortical depths, similar to lowering contrast, whereas activating SOM$^{+}$ neurons had no systematic effect on preferred size across all depths. These data suggest that SOM$^{+}$ and PV$^{+}$ neurons contribute differently to spatial integration. Our findings are compatible with the notion that SOM$^{+}$ neurons mediate surround suppression, particularly in deeper cortex, whereas PV$^{+}$ activation decreases the drive of the input to cortex and therefore resembles the effects on spatial integration of lowering contrast.

}, keywords = {Animals, Contrast Sensitivity, Female, Male, Mice, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Parvalbumins, Photic Stimulation, Somatostatin, Space Perception, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5320-12.2013}, author = {Nienborg, Hendrikje and Hasenstaub, Andrea and Nauhaus, Ian and Taniguchi, Hiroki and Huang, Z Josh and Callaway, Edward M} } @article {201, title = {Evidence that primary visual cortex is required for image, orientation, and motion discrimination by rats.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {8}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {e56543}, abstract = {

The pigmented Long-Evans rat has proven to be an excellent subject for studying visually guided behavior including quantitative visual psychophysics. This observation, together with its experimental accessibility and its close homology to the mouse, has made it an attractive model system in which to dissect the thalamic and cortical circuits underlying visual perception. Given that visually guided behavior in the absence of primary visual cortex has been described in the literature, however, it is an empirical question whether specific visual behaviors will depend on primary visual cortex in the rat. Here we tested the effects of cortical lesions on performance of two-alternative forced-choice visual discriminations by Long-Evans rats. We present data from one highly informative subject that learned several visual tasks and then received a bilateral lesion ablating \>90\% of primary visual cortex. After the lesion, this subject had a profound and persistent deficit in complex image discrimination, orientation discrimination, and full-field optic flow motion discrimination, compared with both pre-lesion performance and sham-lesion controls. Performance was intact, however, on another visual two-alternative forced-choice task that required approaching a salient visual target. A second highly informative subject learned several visual tasks prior to receiving a lesion ablating \>90\% of medial extrastriate cortex. This subject showed no impairment on any of the four task categories. Taken together, our data provide evidence that these image, orientation, and motion discrimination tasks require primary visual cortex in the Long-Evans rat, whereas approaching a salient visual target does not.

}, keywords = {Animals, Discrimination (Psychology), Discrimination Learning, Male, Motion, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Rats, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0056543}, author = {Petruno, Sarah K and Clark, Robert E and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {1671, title = {Rats and humans differ in processing collinear visual features.}, journal = {Front Neural Circuits}, volume = {7}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {197}, abstract = {

Behavioral studies in humans and rats demonstrate that visual detection of a target stimulus is sensitive to surrounding spatial patterns. In both species, the detection of an oriented visual target is affected when the surrounding region contains flanking stimuli that are collinear to the target. In many studies, collinear flankers have been shown to improve performance in humans, both absolutely (compared to performance with no flankers) and relative to non-collinear flankers. More recently, collinear flankers have been shown to impair performance in rats both absolutely and relative to non-collinear flankers. However, these observations spanned different experimental paradigms. Past studies in humans have shown that the magnitude and even sign of flanker effects can depend critically on the details of stimulus and task design. Therefore either task differences or species could explain the opposite findings. Here we provide a direct comparison of behavioral data between species and show that these differences persist--collinear flankers improve performance in humans, and impair performance in rats--in spite of controls that match stimuli, experimental paradigm, and learning procedure. There is evidence that the contrasts of the target and the flankers could affect whether surround processing is suppressive or facilitatory. In a second experiment, we explored a range of contrast conditions in the rat, to determine if contrast could explain the lack of collinear facilitation. Using different pairs of target and flanker contrast, the rat{\textquoteright}s collinear impairment was confirmed to be robust across a range of contrast conditions. We conclude that processing of collinear features is indeed different between rats and humans. We speculate that the observed difference between rat and human is caused by the combined impact of differences in the statistics in natural retinal images, the representational capacity of neurons in visual cortex, and attention.

}, keywords = {Animals, Attention, Contrast Sensitivity, Humans, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Rats, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2013.00197}, author = {Meier, Philip M and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {190, title = {Signed words in the congenitally deaf evoke typical late lexicosemantic responses with no early visual responses in left superior temporal cortex.}, journal = {J Neurosci}, volume = {32}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Jul 11}, pages = {9700-5}, abstract = {

Congenitally deaf individuals receive little or no auditory input, and when raised by deaf parents, they acquire sign as their native and primary language. We asked two questions regarding how the deaf brain in humans adapts to sensory deprivation: (1) is meaning extracted and integrated from signs using the same classical left hemisphere frontotemporal network used for speech in hearing individuals, and (2) in deafness, is superior temporal cortex encompassing primary and secondary auditory regions reorganized to receive and process visual sensory information at short latencies? Using MEG constrained by individual cortical anatomy obtained with MRI, we examined an early time window associated with sensory processing and a late time window associated with lexicosemantic integration. We found that sign in deaf individuals and speech in hearing individuals activate a highly similar left frontotemporal network (including superior temporal regions surrounding auditory cortex) during lexicosemantic processing, but only speech in hearing individuals activates auditory regions during sensory processing. Thus, neural systems dedicated to processing high-level linguistic information are used for processing language regardless of modality or hearing status, and we do not find evidence for rewiring of afferent connections from visual systems to auditory cortex.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Deafness, Evoked Potentials, Female, Functional Laterality, Humans, Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetoencephalography, Male, Photic Stimulation, Semantics, Sign Language, Temporal Lobe, Time Factors, Young Adult}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1002-12.2012}, author = {Leonard, Matthew K and Ferjan Ramirez, Naja and Torres, Christina and Travis, Katherine E and Hatrak, Marla and Mayberry, Rachel I and Halgren, Eric} } @article {188, title = {Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {12}, year = {2012}, month = {2012}, abstract = {

Visual motion processing is essential to survival in a dynamic world and is probably the best-studied facet of visual perception. It has been recently discovered that the timing of brief static sounds can bias visual motion perception, an effect attributed to "temporal ventriloquism" whereby the timing of the sounds "captures" the timing of the visual events. To determine whether this cross-modal interaction is dependent on the involvement of higher-order attentive tracking mechanisms, we used near-threshold motion stimuli that isolated low-level pre-attentive visual motion processing. We found that the timing of brief sounds altered sensitivity to these visual motion stimuli in a manner that paralleled changes in the timing of the visual stimuli. Our findings indicate that auditory timing impacts visual motion processing very early in the processing hierarchy and without the involvement of higher-order attentional and/or position tracking mechanisms.

}, keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation, Attention, Auditory Perception, Humans, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Sound, Time Perception}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/12.11.2}, author = {Kafaligonul, Hulusi and Stoner, Gene R} } @article {202, title = {Visual processing of contour patterns under conditions of inattentional blindness.}, journal = {J Cogn Neurosci}, volume = {24}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Feb}, pages = {287-303}, abstract = {

An inattentional blindness paradigm was adapted to measure ERPs elicited by visual contour patterns that were or were not consciously perceived. In the first phase of the experiment, subjects performed an attentionally demanding task while task-irrelevant line segments formed square-shaped patterns or random configurations. After the square patterns had been presented 240 times, subjects{\textquoteright} awareness of these patterns was assessed. More than half of all subjects, when queried, failed to notice the square patterns and were thus considered inattentionally blind during this first phase. In the second phase of the experiment, the task and stimuli were the same, but following this phase, all of the subjects reported having seen the patterns. ERPs recorded over the occipital pole differed in amplitude from 220 to 260 msec for the pattern stimuli compared with the random arrays regardless of whether subjects were aware of the patterns. At subsequent latencies (300-340 msec) however, ERPs over bilateral occipital-parietal areas differed between patterns and random arrays only when subjects were aware of the patterns. Finally, in a third phase of the experiment, subjects viewed the same stimuli, but the task was altered so that the patterns became task relevant. Here, the same two difference components were evident but were followed by a series of additional components that were absent in the first two phases of the experiment. We hypothesize that the ERP difference at 220-260 msec reflects neural activity associated with automatic contour integration whereas the difference at 300-340 msec reflects visual awareness, both of which are dissociable from task-related postperceptual processing.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attention, Awareness, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Perceptual Masking, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Perception}, issn = {1530-8898}, doi = {10.1162/jocn_a_00111}, author = {Pitts, Michael A and Mart{\'\i}nez, Ant{\'\i}gona and Hillyard, Steven A} } @article {196, title = {Collinear features impair visual detection by rats.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, month = {2011}, abstract = {

We measure rats{\textquoteright} ability to detect an oriented visual target grating located between two flanking stimuli ("flankers"). Flankers varied in contrast, orientation, angular position, and sign. Rats are impaired at detecting visual targets with collinear flankers, compared to configurations where flankers differ from the target in orientation or angular position. In particular, rats are more likely to miss the target when flankers are collinear. The same impairment is found even when the flanker luminance was sign-reversed relative to the target. These findings suggest that contour alignment alters visual processing in rats, despite their lack of orientation columns in the visual cortex. This is the first report that the arrangement of visual features relative to each other affects visual behavior in rats. To provide a conceptual framework for our findings, we relate our stimuli to a contrast normalization model of early visual processing. We suggest a pattern-sensitive generalization of the model that could account for a collinear deficit. These experiments were performed using a novel method for automated high-throughput training and testing of visual behavior in rodents.

}, keywords = {Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning (Psychology), Contrast Sensitivity, Lighting, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Rats, Retina, Space Perception}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/11.3.22}, author = {Meier, Philip and Flister, Erik and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {195, title = {Rat performance on visual detection task modeled with divisive normalization and adaptive decision thresholds.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, month = {2011}, abstract = {

Performance on any perceptual task depends on both the perceptual capacity and the decision strategy of the subject. We provide a model to fit both aspects and apply it to data from rats performing a detection task. When rats must detect a faint visual target, the presence of other nearby stimuli ("flankers") increases the difficulty of the task. In this study, we consider two specific factors. First, flankers could diminish the sensory response to the target via spatial contrast normalization in early visual processing. Second, rats may treat the sensory signal caused by the flankers as if it belonged to the target. We call this source confusion, which may be sensory, cognitive, or both. We account for contrast normalization and source confusion by fitting model parameters to the likelihood of the observed behavioral data. We test multiple combinations of target and flanker contrasts using a yes/no detection task. Contrast normalization was crucial to explain the rats{\textquoteright} flanker-induced detection impairment. By adding a decision variable to the contrast normalization framework, our model provides a new tool to assess differences in visual or cognitive brain function between normal and abnormal rodents.

}, keywords = {Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Conditioning (Psychology), Contrast Sensitivity, Male, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Rats, Rats, Long-Evans, Visual Perception}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/11.9.1}, author = {Meier, Philip and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {187, title = {Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {10}, year = {2010}, month = {2010}, pages = {31}, abstract = {

Recently, E. Freeman and J. Driver (2008) reported a cross-modal temporal interaction in which brief sounds drive the perceived direction of visual apparent-motion, an effect they attributed to "temporal capture" of the visual stimuli by the sounds (S. Morein-Zamir, S. Soto-Faraco, \& A. Kingstone, 2003). Freeman and Driver used "long-range" visual motion stimuli, which travel over long spatial and temporal intervals and engage high-order cortical areas (K. G. Claeys, D. T. Lindsey, E. De Schutter, \& G. A. Orban, 2003; Y. Zhuo et al., 2003). We asked whether Freeman and Driver{\textquoteright}s temporal effects extended to the short-range apparent-motion stimuli that engage cortical area MT, a lower-order area with well-established spatiotemporal selectivity for visual motion (e.g. A. Mikami, 1991, 1992; A. Mikami, W. T. Newsome, \& R. H. Wurtz, 1986a, 1986b; W. T. Newsome, A. Mikami, \& R. H. Wurtz, 1986). Consistent with a temporal-capture account, we found that static sounds bias the perception of both the direction (Experiment 1) and the speed (Experiment 2) of short-range motion. Our results suggest that auditory timing may interact with visual spatiotemporal processing as early as cortical area MT. Examination of the neuronal responses of this well-studied area to the stimuli used in this study would provide a test and might provide insight into the neuronal representation of time.

}, keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Perception, Humans, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Temporal Lobe, Time Perception, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/10.12.31}, author = {Kafaligonul, Hulusi and Stoner, Gene R} } @article {194, title = {Atypical face versus object processing and hemispheric asymmetries in 10-month-old infants at risk for autism.}, journal = {Biol Psychiatry}, volume = {66}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Nov 15}, pages = {950-7}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented atypicalities in face/object processing in children and adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). To investigate whether such atypicalities may reflect a genetically mediated risk factor present early in development, we measured face/object processing in 10-month-old high-risk infants who carry some of the genes associated with ASD because they have an older sibling diagnosed with the disorder.

METHODS: We employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to measure cortical responses to pictures of faces and objects, the objects being toys. Latencies and amplitudes of four ERP components (P100, N290, P400, and Nc) were compared between 20 high-risk infants and 20 low-risk control subjects (infants with no family history of ASD).

RESULTS: Responses to faces versus objects differed between high- and low-risk infants for the latencies of the N290 and P400. Differences were driven by faster responses to faces than objects in low-risk, but not high-risk, infants (P400) and, conversely, faster responses to objects than faces in high-risk, but not low-risk, infants (N290). Object responses were also faster in high-risk than low-risk infants (both N290 and P400). Left versus right hemisphere responses also differed between high- and low-risk infants for the amplitudes of the P100, N290, and P400; collapsed across faces/objects, low-risk, but not high-risk, infants exhibited hemisphere asymmetries.

CONCLUSIONS: Genetic risk for ASD is associated with atypical face versus object processing and an atypical lack of hemispheric asymmetry early in life. These atypicalities might contribute to development of the disorder.

}, keywords = {Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Face, Female, Fourier Analysis, Functional Laterality, Humans, Infant, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Risk}, issn = {1873-2402}, doi = {10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.031}, author = {McCleery, Joseph P and Akshoomoff, Natacha and Dobkins, Karen R and Carver, Leslie J} } @article {133, title = {Illumination controls differentiation of dopamine neurons regulating behaviour.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {456}, year = {2008}, month = {2008 Nov 13}, pages = {195-201}, abstract = {

Specification of the appropriate neurotransmitter is a crucial step in neuronal differentiation because it enables signalling among populations of neurons. Experimental manipulations demonstrate that both autonomous and activity-dependent genetic programs contribute to this process during development, but whether natural environmental stimuli specify transmitter expression in a neuronal population is unknown. We investigated neurons of the ventral suprachiasmatic nucleus that regulate neuroendocrine pituitary function in response to light in teleosts, amphibia and primates. Here we show that altering light exposure, which changes the sensory input to the circuit controlling adaptation of skin pigmentation to background, changes the number of neurons expressing dopamine in larvae of the amphibian Xenopus laevis in a circuit-specific and activity-dependent manner. Neurons newly expressing dopamine then regulate changes in camouflage colouration in response to illumination. Thus, physiological activity alters the numbers of behaviourally relevant amine-transmitter-expressing neurons in the brain at postembryonic stages of development. The results may be pertinent to changes in cognitive states that are regulated by biogenic amines.

}, keywords = {Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Chelating Agents, Dopamine, Egtazic Acid, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Larva, Light, Lighting, Melanotrophs, Neurons, Neuropeptide Y, Photic Stimulation, Skin Pigmentation, Sodium Channel Blockers, Suprachiasmatic Nucleus, Tetrodotoxin, Xenopus laevis}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature07569}, author = {Dulcis, Davide and Spitzer, Nicholas C} }