@article {200, title = {Contrast dependence and differential contributions from somatostatin- and parvalbumin-expressing neurons to spatial integration in mouse V1.}, journal = {J Neurosci}, volume = {33}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Jul 3}, pages = {11145-54}, abstract = {

A characteristic feature in the primary visual cortex is that visual responses are suppressed as a stimulus extends beyond the classical receptive field. Here, we examined the role of inhibitory neurons expressing somatostatin (SOM$^{+}$) or parvalbumin (PV$^{+}$) on surround suppression and preferred receptive field size. We recorded multichannel extracellular activity in V1 of transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin in SOM$^{+}$ neurons or PV$^{+}$ neurons. Preferred size and surround suppression were measured using drifting square-wave gratings of varying radii and at two contrasts. Consistent with findings in primates, we found that the preferred size was larger for lower contrasts across all cortical depths, whereas the suppression index (SI) showed a trend to decrease with contrast. We then examined the effect of these metrics on units that were suppressed by photoactivation of either SOM$^{+}$ or PV$^{+}$ neurons. When activating SOM$^{+}$ neurons, we found a significant increase in SI at cortical depths \>400 μm, whereas activating PV$^{+}$ neurons caused a trend toward lower SIs regardless of cortical depth. Conversely, activating PV$^{+}$ neurons significantly increased preferred size across all cortical depths, similar to lowering contrast, whereas activating SOM$^{+}$ neurons had no systematic effect on preferred size across all depths. These data suggest that SOM$^{+}$ and PV$^{+}$ neurons contribute differently to spatial integration. Our findings are compatible with the notion that SOM$^{+}$ neurons mediate surround suppression, particularly in deeper cortex, whereas PV$^{+}$ activation decreases the drive of the input to cortex and therefore resembles the effects on spatial integration of lowering contrast.

}, keywords = {Animals, Contrast Sensitivity, Female, Male, Mice, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Parvalbumins, Photic Stimulation, Somatostatin, Space Perception, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1529-2401}, doi = {10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5320-12.2013}, author = {Nienborg, Hendrikje and Hasenstaub, Andrea and Nauhaus, Ian and Taniguchi, Hiroki and Huang, Z Josh and Callaway, Edward M} } @article {201, title = {Evidence that primary visual cortex is required for image, orientation, and motion discrimination by rats.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {8}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {e56543}, abstract = {

The pigmented Long-Evans rat has proven to be an excellent subject for studying visually guided behavior including quantitative visual psychophysics. This observation, together with its experimental accessibility and its close homology to the mouse, has made it an attractive model system in which to dissect the thalamic and cortical circuits underlying visual perception. Given that visually guided behavior in the absence of primary visual cortex has been described in the literature, however, it is an empirical question whether specific visual behaviors will depend on primary visual cortex in the rat. Here we tested the effects of cortical lesions on performance of two-alternative forced-choice visual discriminations by Long-Evans rats. We present data from one highly informative subject that learned several visual tasks and then received a bilateral lesion ablating \>90\% of primary visual cortex. After the lesion, this subject had a profound and persistent deficit in complex image discrimination, orientation discrimination, and full-field optic flow motion discrimination, compared with both pre-lesion performance and sham-lesion controls. Performance was intact, however, on another visual two-alternative forced-choice task that required approaching a salient visual target. A second highly informative subject learned several visual tasks prior to receiving a lesion ablating \>90\% of medial extrastriate cortex. This subject showed no impairment on any of the four task categories. Taken together, our data provide evidence that these image, orientation, and motion discrimination tasks require primary visual cortex in the Long-Evans rat, whereas approaching a salient visual target does not.

}, keywords = {Animals, Discrimination (Psychology), Discrimination Learning, Male, Motion, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Rats, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0056543}, author = {Petruno, Sarah K and Clark, Robert E and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {1671, title = {Rats and humans differ in processing collinear visual features.}, journal = {Front Neural Circuits}, volume = {7}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {197}, abstract = {

Behavioral studies in humans and rats demonstrate that visual detection of a target stimulus is sensitive to surrounding spatial patterns. In both species, the detection of an oriented visual target is affected when the surrounding region contains flanking stimuli that are collinear to the target. In many studies, collinear flankers have been shown to improve performance in humans, both absolutely (compared to performance with no flankers) and relative to non-collinear flankers. More recently, collinear flankers have been shown to impair performance in rats both absolutely and relative to non-collinear flankers. However, these observations spanned different experimental paradigms. Past studies in humans have shown that the magnitude and even sign of flanker effects can depend critically on the details of stimulus and task design. Therefore either task differences or species could explain the opposite findings. Here we provide a direct comparison of behavioral data between species and show that these differences persist--collinear flankers improve performance in humans, and impair performance in rats--in spite of controls that match stimuli, experimental paradigm, and learning procedure. There is evidence that the contrasts of the target and the flankers could affect whether surround processing is suppressive or facilitatory. In a second experiment, we explored a range of contrast conditions in the rat, to determine if contrast could explain the lack of collinear facilitation. Using different pairs of target and flanker contrast, the rat{\textquoteright}s collinear impairment was confirmed to be robust across a range of contrast conditions. We conclude that processing of collinear features is indeed different between rats and humans. We speculate that the observed difference between rat and human is caused by the combined impact of differences in the statistics in natural retinal images, the representational capacity of neurons in visual cortex, and attention.

}, keywords = {Animals, Attention, Contrast Sensitivity, Humans, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Rats, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2013.00197}, author = {Meier, Philip M and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {187, title = {Auditory modulation of visual apparent motion with short spatial and temporal intervals.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {10}, year = {2010}, month = {2010}, pages = {31}, abstract = {

Recently, E. Freeman and J. Driver (2008) reported a cross-modal temporal interaction in which brief sounds drive the perceived direction of visual apparent-motion, an effect they attributed to "temporal capture" of the visual stimuli by the sounds (S. Morein-Zamir, S. Soto-Faraco, \& A. Kingstone, 2003). Freeman and Driver used "long-range" visual motion stimuli, which travel over long spatial and temporal intervals and engage high-order cortical areas (K. G. Claeys, D. T. Lindsey, E. De Schutter, \& G. A. Orban, 2003; Y. Zhuo et al., 2003). We asked whether Freeman and Driver{\textquoteright}s temporal effects extended to the short-range apparent-motion stimuli that engage cortical area MT, a lower-order area with well-established spatiotemporal selectivity for visual motion (e.g. A. Mikami, 1991, 1992; A. Mikami, W. T. Newsome, \& R. H. Wurtz, 1986a, 1986b; W. T. Newsome, A. Mikami, \& R. H. Wurtz, 1986). Consistent with a temporal-capture account, we found that static sounds bias the perception of both the direction (Experiment 1) and the speed (Experiment 2) of short-range motion. Our results suggest that auditory timing may interact with visual spatiotemporal processing as early as cortical area MT. Examination of the neuronal responses of this well-studied area to the stimuli used in this study would provide a test and might provide insight into the neuronal representation of time.

}, keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Perception, Humans, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Temporal Lobe, Time Perception, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/10.12.31}, author = {Kafaligonul, Hulusi and Stoner, Gene R} } @article {193, title = {Targeting single neuronal networks for gene expression and cell labeling in vivo.}, journal = {Neuron}, volume = {67}, year = {2010}, month = {2010 Aug 26}, pages = {562-74}, abstract = {

To understand fine-scale structure and function of single mammalian neuronal networks, we developed and validated a strategy to genetically target and trace monosynaptic inputs to a single neuron in vitro and in vivo. The strategy independently targets a neuron and its presynaptic network for specific gene expression and fine-scale labeling, using single-cell electroporation of DNA to target infection and monosynaptic retrograde spread of a genetically modifiable rabies virus. The technique is highly reliable, with transsynaptic labeling occurring in every electroporated neuron infected by the virus. Targeting single neocortical neuronal networks in vivo, we found clusters of both spiny and aspiny neurons surrounding the electroporated neuron in each case, in addition to intricately labeled distal cortical and subcortical inputs. This technique, broadly applicable for probing and manipulating single neuronal networks with single-cell resolution in vivo, may help shed new light on fundamental mechanisms underlying circuit development and information processing by neuronal networks throughout the brain.

}, keywords = {Animals, Electroporation, Gene Expression, Genetic Vectors, Histological Techniques, In Vitro Techniques, Mice, Neocortex, Neural Pathways, Neuroanatomical Tract-Tracing Techniques, Neuronal Tract-Tracers, Neurons, Presynaptic Terminals, Pyramidal Cells, Rabies virus, Rats, Reproducibility of Results, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1097-4199}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.001}, author = {Marshel, James H and Mori, Takuma and Nielsen, Kristina J and Callaway, Edward M} }