@article {1678, title = {Motion dependence of smooth pursuit eye movements in the marmoset.}, journal = {J Neurophysiol}, volume = {113}, year = {2015}, month = {2015 Jun 01}, pages = {3954-60}, abstract = {

Smooth pursuit eye movements stabilize slow-moving objects on the retina by matching eye velocity with target velocity. Two critical components are required to generate smooth pursuit: first, because it is a voluntary eye movement, the subject must select a target to pursue to engage the tracking system; and second, generating smooth pursuit requires a moving stimulus. We examined whether this behavior also exists in the common marmoset, a New World primate that is increasingly attracting attention as a genetic model for mental disease and systems neuroscience. We measured smooth pursuit in two marmosets, previously trained to perform fixation tasks, using the standard Rashbass step-ramp pursuit paradigm. We first measured the aspects of visual motion that drive pursuit eye movements. Smooth eye movements were in the same direction as target motion, indicating that pursuit was driven by target movement rather than by displacement. Both the open-loop acceleration and closed-loop eye velocity exhibited a linear relationship with target velocity for slow-moving targets, but this relationship declined for higher speeds. We next examined whether marmoset pursuit eye movements depend on an active engagement of the pursuit system by measuring smooth eye movements evoked by small perturbations of motion from fixation or during pursuit. Pursuit eye movements were much larger during pursuit than from fixation, indicating that pursuit is actively gated. Several practical advantages of the marmoset brain, including the accessibility of the middle temporal (MT) area and frontal eye fields at the cortical surface, merit its utilization for studying pursuit movements.

}, keywords = {Acceleration, Animals, Callithrix, Motion, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Pursuit, Smooth, Retina, Visual Fields}, issn = {1522-1598}, doi = {10.1152/jn.00197.2015}, author = {Mitchell, Jude F and Priebe, Nicholas J and Miller, Cory T} } @article {196, title = {Collinear features impair visual detection by rats.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, month = {2011}, abstract = {

We measure rats{\textquoteright} ability to detect an oriented visual target grating located between two flanking stimuli ("flankers"). Flankers varied in contrast, orientation, angular position, and sign. Rats are impaired at detecting visual targets with collinear flankers, compared to configurations where flankers differ from the target in orientation or angular position. In particular, rats are more likely to miss the target when flankers are collinear. The same impairment is found even when the flanker luminance was sign-reversed relative to the target. These findings suggest that contour alignment alters visual processing in rats, despite their lack of orientation columns in the visual cortex. This is the first report that the arrangement of visual features relative to each other affects visual behavior in rats. To provide a conceptual framework for our findings, we relate our stimuli to a contrast normalization model of early visual processing. We suggest a pattern-sensitive generalization of the model that could account for a collinear deficit. These experiments were performed using a novel method for automated high-throughput training and testing of visual behavior in rodents.

}, keywords = {Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning (Psychology), Contrast Sensitivity, Lighting, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Rats, Retina, Space Perception}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/11.3.22}, author = {Meier, Philip and Flister, Erik and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {149, title = {Salience modulates 20-30 Hz brain activity in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nat Neurosci}, volume = {6}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Jun}, pages = {579-86}, abstract = {

Fruit flies selectively orient toward the visual stimuli that are most salient in their environment. We recorded local field potentials (LFPs) from the brains of Drosophila melanogaster as they responded to the presentation of visual stimuli. Coupling of salience effects (odor, heat or novelty) to these stimuli modulated LFPs in the 20-30 Hz range by evoking a transient, selective increase. We demonstrated the association of these responses with behavioral tracking and initiated a genetic approach to investigating neural correlates of perception.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cues, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Exploratory Behavior, Mutation, Neurons, Orientation, Retina, Smell, Synaptic Transmission, Thermosensing, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/nn1054}, author = {van Swinderen, Bruno and Greenspan, Ralph J} }