@article {1688, title = {Subiculum neurons map the current axis of travel.}, journal = {Nat Neurosci}, volume = {20}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 02}, pages = {170-172}, abstract = {

Flexible navigation demands knowledge of boundaries, routes and their relationships. Within a multi-path environment, a subpopulation of subiculum neurons robustly encoded the axis of travel. The firing of axis-tuned neurons peaked bimodally, at head orientations 180{\textdegree} apart. Environmental manipulations showed these neurons to be anchored to environmental boundaries but to lack axis tuning in an open arena. Axis-tuned neurons thus provide a powerful mechanism for mapping relationships between routes and the larger environmental context.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Brain Mapping, Hippocampus, Male, Neurons, Orientation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Space Perception}, issn = {1546-1726}, doi = {10.1038/nn.4464}, author = {Olson, Jacob M and Tongprasearth, Kanyanat and Nitz, Douglas A} } @article {201, title = {Evidence that primary visual cortex is required for image, orientation, and motion discrimination by rats.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {8}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {e56543}, abstract = {

The pigmented Long-Evans rat has proven to be an excellent subject for studying visually guided behavior including quantitative visual psychophysics. This observation, together with its experimental accessibility and its close homology to the mouse, has made it an attractive model system in which to dissect the thalamic and cortical circuits underlying visual perception. Given that visually guided behavior in the absence of primary visual cortex has been described in the literature, however, it is an empirical question whether specific visual behaviors will depend on primary visual cortex in the rat. Here we tested the effects of cortical lesions on performance of two-alternative forced-choice visual discriminations by Long-Evans rats. We present data from one highly informative subject that learned several visual tasks and then received a bilateral lesion ablating \>90\% of primary visual cortex. After the lesion, this subject had a profound and persistent deficit in complex image discrimination, orientation discrimination, and full-field optic flow motion discrimination, compared with both pre-lesion performance and sham-lesion controls. Performance was intact, however, on another visual two-alternative forced-choice task that required approaching a salient visual target. A second highly informative subject learned several visual tasks prior to receiving a lesion ablating \>90\% of medial extrastriate cortex. This subject showed no impairment on any of the four task categories. Taken together, our data provide evidence that these image, orientation, and motion discrimination tasks require primary visual cortex in the Long-Evans rat, whereas approaching a salient visual target does not.

}, keywords = {Animals, Discrimination (Psychology), Discrimination Learning, Male, Motion, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Rats, Visual Cortex}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0056543}, author = {Petruno, Sarah K and Clark, Robert E and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {1671, title = {Rats and humans differ in processing collinear visual features.}, journal = {Front Neural Circuits}, volume = {7}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {197}, abstract = {

Behavioral studies in humans and rats demonstrate that visual detection of a target stimulus is sensitive to surrounding spatial patterns. In both species, the detection of an oriented visual target is affected when the surrounding region contains flanking stimuli that are collinear to the target. In many studies, collinear flankers have been shown to improve performance in humans, both absolutely (compared to performance with no flankers) and relative to non-collinear flankers. More recently, collinear flankers have been shown to impair performance in rats both absolutely and relative to non-collinear flankers. However, these observations spanned different experimental paradigms. Past studies in humans have shown that the magnitude and even sign of flanker effects can depend critically on the details of stimulus and task design. Therefore either task differences or species could explain the opposite findings. Here we provide a direct comparison of behavioral data between species and show that these differences persist--collinear flankers improve performance in humans, and impair performance in rats--in spite of controls that match stimuli, experimental paradigm, and learning procedure. There is evidence that the contrasts of the target and the flankers could affect whether surround processing is suppressive or facilitatory. In a second experiment, we explored a range of contrast conditions in the rat, to determine if contrast could explain the lack of collinear facilitation. Using different pairs of target and flanker contrast, the rat{\textquoteright}s collinear impairment was confirmed to be robust across a range of contrast conditions. We conclude that processing of collinear features is indeed different between rats and humans. We speculate that the observed difference between rat and human is caused by the combined impact of differences in the statistics in natural retinal images, the representational capacity of neurons in visual cortex, and attention.

}, keywords = {Animals, Attention, Contrast Sensitivity, Humans, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Rats, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2013.00197}, author = {Meier, Philip M and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {196, title = {Collinear features impair visual detection by rats.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {11}, year = {2011}, month = {2011}, abstract = {

We measure rats{\textquoteright} ability to detect an oriented visual target grating located between two flanking stimuli ("flankers"). Flankers varied in contrast, orientation, angular position, and sign. Rats are impaired at detecting visual targets with collinear flankers, compared to configurations where flankers differ from the target in orientation or angular position. In particular, rats are more likely to miss the target when flankers are collinear. The same impairment is found even when the flanker luminance was sign-reversed relative to the target. These findings suggest that contour alignment alters visual processing in rats, despite their lack of orientation columns in the visual cortex. This is the first report that the arrangement of visual features relative to each other affects visual behavior in rats. To provide a conceptual framework for our findings, we relate our stimuli to a contrast normalization model of early visual processing. We suggest a pattern-sensitive generalization of the model that could account for a collinear deficit. These experiments were performed using a novel method for automated high-throughput training and testing of visual behavior in rodents.

}, keywords = {Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning (Psychology), Contrast Sensitivity, Lighting, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Rats, Retina, Space Perception}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/11.3.22}, author = {Meier, Philip and Flister, Erik and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {149, title = {Salience modulates 20-30 Hz brain activity in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nat Neurosci}, volume = {6}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Jun}, pages = {579-86}, abstract = {

Fruit flies selectively orient toward the visual stimuli that are most salient in their environment. We recorded local field potentials (LFPs) from the brains of Drosophila melanogaster as they responded to the presentation of visual stimuli. Coupling of salience effects (odor, heat or novelty) to these stimuli modulated LFPs in the 20-30 Hz range by evoking a transient, selective increase. We demonstrated the association of these responses with behavioral tracking and initiated a genetic approach to investigating neural correlates of perception.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cues, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Exploratory Behavior, Mutation, Neurons, Orientation, Retina, Smell, Synaptic Transmission, Thermosensing, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/nn1054}, author = {van Swinderen, Bruno and Greenspan, Ralph J} }