@article {203, title = {Gamma band activity and the P3 reflect post-perceptual processes, not visual awareness.}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {101}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Nov 1}, pages = {337-50}, abstract = {

A primary goal in cognitive neuroscience is to identify neural correlates of conscious perception (NCC). By contrasting conditions in which subjects are aware versus unaware of identical visual stimuli, a number of candidate NCCs have emerged; among them are induced gamma band activity in the EEG and the P3 event-related potential. In most previous studies, however, the critical stimuli were always directly relevant to the subjects{\textquoteright} task, such that aware versus unaware contrasts may well have included differences in post-perceptual processing in addition to differences in conscious perception per se. Here, in a series of EEG experiments, visual awareness and task relevance were manipulated independently. Induced gamma activity and the P3 were absent for task-irrelevant stimuli regardless of whether subjects were aware of such stimuli. For task-relevant stimuli, gamma and the P3 were robust and dissociable, indicating that each reflects distinct post-perceptual processes necessary for carrying-out the task but not for consciously perceiving the stimuli. Overall, this pattern of results challenges a number of previous proposals linking gamma band activity and the P3 to conscious perception.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attention, Awareness, Consciousness, Electroencephalography, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Female, Gamma Rhythm, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception, Young Adult}, issn = {1095-9572}, doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.024}, author = {Pitts, Michael A and Padwal, Jennifer and Fennelly, Daniel and Mart{\'\i}nez, Ant{\'\i}gona and Hillyard, Steven A} } @article {1671, title = {Rats and humans differ in processing collinear visual features.}, journal = {Front Neural Circuits}, volume = {7}, year = {2013}, month = {2013}, pages = {197}, abstract = {

Behavioral studies in humans and rats demonstrate that visual detection of a target stimulus is sensitive to surrounding spatial patterns. In both species, the detection of an oriented visual target is affected when the surrounding region contains flanking stimuli that are collinear to the target. In many studies, collinear flankers have been shown to improve performance in humans, both absolutely (compared to performance with no flankers) and relative to non-collinear flankers. More recently, collinear flankers have been shown to impair performance in rats both absolutely and relative to non-collinear flankers. However, these observations spanned different experimental paradigms. Past studies in humans have shown that the magnitude and even sign of flanker effects can depend critically on the details of stimulus and task design. Therefore either task differences or species could explain the opposite findings. Here we provide a direct comparison of behavioral data between species and show that these differences persist--collinear flankers improve performance in humans, and impair performance in rats--in spite of controls that match stimuli, experimental paradigm, and learning procedure. There is evidence that the contrasts of the target and the flankers could affect whether surround processing is suppressive or facilitatory. In a second experiment, we explored a range of contrast conditions in the rat, to determine if contrast could explain the lack of collinear facilitation. Using different pairs of target and flanker contrast, the rat{\textquoteright}s collinear impairment was confirmed to be robust across a range of contrast conditions. We conclude that processing of collinear features is indeed different between rats and humans. We speculate that the observed difference between rat and human is caused by the combined impact of differences in the statistics in natural retinal images, the representational capacity of neurons in visual cortex, and attention.

}, keywords = {Animals, Attention, Contrast Sensitivity, Humans, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Rats, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2013.00197}, author = {Meier, Philip M and Reinagel, Pamela} } @article {181, title = {Atypical social referencing in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders.}, journal = {J Autism Dev Disord}, volume = {42}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Dec}, pages = {2611-21}, abstract = {

Social referencing was investigated in 18-month-old siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD; "high-risk infants"). Infants were exposed to novel toys, which were emotionally tagged via adults{\textquoteright} facial and vocal signals. Infants{\textquoteright} information seeking (initiation of joint attention with an adult) and their approach/withdrawal behavior toward the toys before versus after the adults{\textquoteright} emotional signals was measured. Compared to both typically developing infants and high-risk infants without ASD, infants later diagnosed with ASD engaged in slower information seeking, suggesting that this aspect of referencing may be an early indicator of ASD. High-risk infants, both those who were and those who were not later diagnosed with ASD, exhibited impairments in regulating their behavior based on the adults{\textquoteright} emotional signals, suggesting that this aspect of social referencing may reflect an endophenotype for ASD.

}, keywords = {Attention, Child, Child Development, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Emotions, Endophenotypes, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Behavior, Male, Risk Factors, Siblings, Social Behavior}, issn = {1573-3432}, doi = {10.1007/s10803-012-1518-8}, author = {Cornew, Lauren and Dobkins, Karen R and Akshoomoff, Natacha and McCleery, Joseph P and Carver, Leslie J} } @article {188, title = {Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.}, journal = {J Vis}, volume = {12}, year = {2012}, month = {2012}, abstract = {

Visual motion processing is essential to survival in a dynamic world and is probably the best-studied facet of visual perception. It has been recently discovered that the timing of brief static sounds can bias visual motion perception, an effect attributed to "temporal ventriloquism" whereby the timing of the sounds "captures" the timing of the visual events. To determine whether this cross-modal interaction is dependent on the involvement of higher-order attentive tracking mechanisms, we used near-threshold motion stimuli that isolated low-level pre-attentive visual motion processing. We found that the timing of brief sounds altered sensitivity to these visual motion stimuli in a manner that paralleled changes in the timing of the visual stimuli. Our findings indicate that auditory timing impacts visual motion processing very early in the processing hierarchy and without the involvement of higher-order attentional and/or position tracking mechanisms.

}, keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation, Attention, Auditory Perception, Humans, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Sound, Time Perception}, issn = {1534-7362}, doi = {10.1167/12.11.2}, author = {Kafaligonul, Hulusi and Stoner, Gene R} } @article {202, title = {Visual processing of contour patterns under conditions of inattentional blindness.}, journal = {J Cogn Neurosci}, volume = {24}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Feb}, pages = {287-303}, abstract = {

An inattentional blindness paradigm was adapted to measure ERPs elicited by visual contour patterns that were or were not consciously perceived. In the first phase of the experiment, subjects performed an attentionally demanding task while task-irrelevant line segments formed square-shaped patterns or random configurations. After the square patterns had been presented 240 times, subjects{\textquoteright} awareness of these patterns was assessed. More than half of all subjects, when queried, failed to notice the square patterns and were thus considered inattentionally blind during this first phase. In the second phase of the experiment, the task and stimuli were the same, but following this phase, all of the subjects reported having seen the patterns. ERPs recorded over the occipital pole differed in amplitude from 220 to 260 msec for the pattern stimuli compared with the random arrays regardless of whether subjects were aware of the patterns. At subsequent latencies (300-340 msec) however, ERPs over bilateral occipital-parietal areas differed between patterns and random arrays only when subjects were aware of the patterns. Finally, in a third phase of the experiment, subjects viewed the same stimuli, but the task was altered so that the patterns became task relevant. Here, the same two difference components were evident but were followed by a series of additional components that were absent in the first two phases of the experiment. We hypothesize that the ERP difference at 220-260 msec reflects neural activity associated with automatic contour integration whereas the difference at 300-340 msec reflects visual awareness, both of which are dissociable from task-related postperceptual processing.

}, keywords = {Adult, Attention, Awareness, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Perceptual Masking, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Visual Perception}, issn = {1530-8898}, doi = {10.1162/jocn_a_00111}, author = {Pitts, Michael A and Mart{\'\i}nez, Ant{\'\i}gona and Hillyard, Steven A} } @article {149, title = {Salience modulates 20-30 Hz brain activity in Drosophila.}, journal = {Nat Neurosci}, volume = {6}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Jun}, pages = {579-86}, abstract = {

Fruit flies selectively orient toward the visual stimuli that are most salient in their environment. We recorded local field potentials (LFPs) from the brains of Drosophila melanogaster as they responded to the presentation of visual stimuli. Coupling of salience effects (odor, heat or novelty) to these stimuli modulated LFPs in the 20-30 Hz range by evoking a transient, selective increase. We demonstrated the association of these responses with behavioral tracking and initiated a genetic approach to investigating neural correlates of perception.

}, keywords = {Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cues, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Exploratory Behavior, Mutation, Neurons, Orientation, Retina, Smell, Synaptic Transmission, Thermosensing, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception}, issn = {1097-6256}, doi = {10.1038/nn1054}, author = {van Swinderen, Bruno and Greenspan, Ralph J} }